When Science met Big Society

Yesterday’s announce­ment that the Arts and Human­i­ties Research Coun­cil will, on pain of los­ing fund­ing, devote a “sig­nif­i­cant” amount of time to study­ing the notion of “Big Soci­ety” is frankly shock­ing. If it is indeed true, it smacks of incred­i­ble ego­tism on the part of the government.

The government’s money is the people’s money — if we’re not going to leave the job of decid­ing what to research to the actual researchers, why should the government’s whims be involved? If there were a ref­er­en­dum on it now, what pro­por­tion of the tax-paying pub­lic would label the Big Soci­ety as a steam­ing pile of shite that we shouldn’t be throw­ing any more money at?

Con­versely, how many of the government’s other sweep­ing changes — the pro­gramme of cuts (Warn­ing: least impar­tial sum­mary ever) that we are now sub­ject to, for exam­ple — have been the sub­ject of such hopefully-independent research?

A future UKIP gov­ern­ment promises to ban global warm­ing research, and apart from the cli­mate change deniers, I’m con­fi­dent the pub­lic would not sup­port that par­tic­u­lar aspect of gov­ern­men­tal med­dling in research. So why are we putting up with this?

(And on a related note, does any­one else think it’s a lit­tle odd to com­mis­sion research on a pol­icy after com­mit­ting to it?)

tl,dr: Hands off mah sci­ence, government.

A Day Snowbound

The weather, like the best of muses, is capri­cious and arbitrary.

Snowy Road

Yes­ter­day I had no prob­lem at all catch­ing buses and trains to get from our home to Guild­ford, a good hun­dred miles away. Guild­ford was under 3–4 inches of snow, com­plete with the req­ui­site ice under­neath, so using the pushchair was a chal­lenge — but we made it.

This morn­ing, an inch fell on Bournemouth. And paral­ysed it.

The photo below is Queens Road this morn­ing, which nat­u­rally, the coun­cil have not grit­ted. Of course not, I mean, it’s only a 1-in-5 hill on a bus route. Why would they want to grit that?

With my car­pool absent, rail ser­vices reduced and no buses going my direc­tion as far as I could tell, I gave up and for lack of any­thing bet­ter to do, started grit­ting Queens Road myself. See that non-snowy bit? That’s a pro­duc­tive morn­ing right there.

Big Society, bitches!

Big Soci­ety, bitches!

So, no work for me today, and since my lap­top is also at work, I can’t pre­tend to be work­ing from home. On the other hand, a lot of dri­vers looked pretty happy — and the falling snow has been replaced by rain, so hope­fully the town will have resumed nor­mal ser­vice again tomorrow.

The Meh Society

Today, Ed Miliband gave his accep­tance speech to the Labour party con­fer­ence, and hav­ing watched it, I caught myself acci­den­tally feel­ing cau­tiously opti­mistic. Have no fear, that feel­ing was quickly despatched and I remain my nor­mal cyn­i­cal self.

One par­tic­u­lar term he used which grated hor­ri­bly for me was “the good soci­ety”. The Good Soci­ety, really? Was the Tories’ equiv­a­lent not annoy­ing enough already?

The thing about “the Big Soci­ety” and “the Good Soci­ety” is that they’re sound­bites and they don’t mean any­thing, and that for some rea­son annoys me more than it ought to.

We’re just about com­ing to under­stand that Cameron’s “Big Soci­ety” is about par­ents build­ing schools and get­ting char­i­ties to pick up the bill for things the gov­ern­ment can’t afford to fix. It seems to be a par­tial removal of the state’s abstrac­tion layer: instead of want­ing schools, pay­ing taxes and let­ting some­one qual­i­fied turn one into the other, you’re now encour­aged to take on that over­head your­selves so that they can sack half the pub­lic sec­tor workers.

Wait, this wasn’t sup­posed to be a rant about that Society.

No, the “Good Soci­ety” is even more neb­u­lous, and I hope it doesn’t become a buzz­word like its alter ego. What is it sup­posed to entail? Us being vaguely nice to each other and hop­ing it all works out?

For all the catchy phrases that politi­cians throw around, the major­ity of the pub­lic are com­mit­ted mem­bers of the “Meh Soci­ety”. We want to pay taxes at a rea­son­able level, and get good pub­lic ser­vices as a result. And in the main we’re nice peo­ple, but we’re also pretty cyn­i­cal about pol­i­tics, and being declared part of “the Good Soci­ety” or “the Big Soci­ety” just doesn’t entrhrall us as much as those in par­lia­ment would like to believe.

My Contribution to Big Society

Today, Prime Min­is­ter David Cameron launched his ‘Big Soci­ety’ ini­tia­tive, aimed at empow­er­ing local com­mu­ni­ties to fix their own prob­lems. On the sur­face it sounds to me like a nice idea, get­ting neigh­bours to work together to save their post office or whatever.

But of course, no-one really knows how it’s going to hap­pen yet, or if there’s any money. And money will be needed. No inde­pen­dent community-built schools are going to spring up if the only peo­ple who can vol­un­teer their time are house­wives and a bunch of unem­ployed sales exec­u­tives. Peo­ple need train­ing, and even after a bit of train­ing, they’ll still not do the job as well as pro­fes­sion­als. Appar­ently the gov­ern­ment can’t afford to pay actual builders to build schools, so is this part of the ‘Big Soci­ety’ plan doing any more than invest­ing in cheap, shoddy infra­struc­ture that will fall to the com­mu­nity to main­tain when it starts falling down?

It all seems based on the idea that no-one’s got much money but we’ve all some­how got a lot of spare time. Which, with unem­ploy­ment threat­en­ing to rise even higher, is pretty much true. Unfor­tu­nately, all the peo­ple in this sit­u­a­tion are spend­ing all their spare time try­ing to get money again, by means of find­ing a job that actu­ally pays them. ‘Big Soci­ety’ doesn’t dish out feel-good points that can be traded in at the food bank.

In an attempt to find some money for train­ing and so that there is some finan­cial incen­tive for these vol­un­teers, Cameron also sug­gests “…announc­ing plans to use dor­mant bank accounts to fund projects.” Wait. Are you nation­al­is­ing our bank accounts? How exactly does he pro­pose to do that, and has any­one else done that in recent his­tory besides Com­mu­nist dic­ta­tors? (Or, more likely, am I com­pletely fail­ing to grasp the actual plan here?)

Any­way, I’m feel­ing pretty good about my con­tri­bu­tion to the Big Soci­ety. With all the web­sites ask­ing what we should cut the hard­est, with Con­ser­v­a­tive and Lib Dem man­i­festos falling by the way­side, and with the gov­ern­ment wash­ing their hands of com­mu­nity projects, I think I’ve found myself some­where to volunteer.

In the deprived cen­tral Lon­don bor­ough of West­min­ster, there are plenty of vol­un­teers work­ing in char­ity shops and soup kitchens — but where we’re really lack­ing, where we really need to come together and save our com­mu­nity, is in the area of policy-making. Since the gov­ern­ment clearly isn’t keen on doing it them­selves, I humbly pro­pose myself as a vol­un­teer here. I could spare a few hours after work each night to down a few pints in the Com­mons bar before head­ing to the Cham­ber and being an angry leftie at peo­ple until the gov­ern­ment realises that we pay tax so that they fund these projects, not us.