Film Review by the Numbers: Watchmen

“Watch­men”, Alan-Moore-disapproves edition.

SOME GUY dies. A DUDE WITH A HAT tries to find out why. There is a GIANT BLUE GUY with a GIANT BLUE DONG. Lots of peo­ple get beaten up. There are AMERICANS and RUSSIANS and lots of NUKES, and lots of peo­ple die, but not bea­cuse of the NUKES. Comic fans are VAGUELY APPEASED, and it could have been A LOT WORSE, ALL THINGS CONSIDERED.

Ror­shach cool­ness: 10
Silk Spec­tre hot­ness: 9
Night Owl dork­i­ness: 9
Occur­rences of Doc­tor Manhattan’s giant blue dong: 7
Bru­tal killings: 37
Direc­to­ries enti­tled “boys” on Ozy­man­dias’ com­puter: 1
Squid: 0
Soppy roman­tic end­ing rage-induction: over 9000
Notably absent pages of dead and dying cit­i­zens of New York: 12
Gayest-looking super­hero mode of trans­port in any comic: 1

Over­all: 5/5

One thought on “Film Review by the Numbers: Watchmen

  1. What’s this?
    I’m a bit late to comment…but no men­tion of one of the most cringe­wor­thy sex scenes I’ve seen in main­stream cinema?

    I mean, there are some pretty bad ones, but a painfully dragged out closeup of suited-up Night Owl’s sweaty arse gyrat­ing slowly to Hal­lelu­jah (pre­vi­ously a beloved song of mine) was har­row­ing, to say the least.

    And that’s skim­ming over Malin Åkerman’s hilar­i­ous expres­sions of what I can only assume to be silent screams of abject horror.

Leave a Reply

Connect with:

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> <pre lang="" line="" escaped="" highlight="">